A Development Opportunity or Rural Distress: What the Unpacking of Sompeta Wetland Agitation has to Say About India’s Developmental Policies?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2024/v43/i3/154135Keywords:
Property of Commons, Land Grabbing, Dispossession, Sompeta Wetlands.Abstract
Today, there is an increase in the number of rural populations forcibly evicted from their land to make way for large-scale development projects, resulting in a decline in the land available for agriculture. Adding to the existing rural distress is the land grabbing for projects that are harmful to the environment, unhealthy, and unsustainable for the local communities. Land dispossession is proclaimed legal and inevitable, even when it encroaches on many undocumented users’ right to livelihood. The study aims to uncover resistance against the dispossession of communities dependent on a unique ecological system, the Sompeta wetland, a coastal freshwater wetland used as a property of commons for generations in the Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh, India. It represents land grabbing for such projects subject to farmers’ resentment. The project-affected population claims that the project was not a development opportunity; instead, it can deepen rural distress led by the state to shift property rights from the communities to the private. The state is misrepresenting the data, criminalising peoples’ resistance by using force and violence, and going by a fallacious understanding of dispossession even though the project is a threat to the environment, health, peoples’ right to livelihood, and their cultural identities.
Downloads
References
Andersson, K., & Agarwal, A. (2011). Inequalities, Institutions, and Forest Commons. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 866–875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.004
Ansoms, A., & Hilhorst, T. M. (2014). Losing Your Land: Dispossession in the Great Lakes. James Curry. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781782043416
Campo, G. R., & Jimenez, E. K. (2021). Amphibious Territory and Dispossession in a Protected Wetland Area of the Colombian Caribbean. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 76, 75–92.
Comaroff, J. L., & Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226114736.001.0001
Comaroff, J. L. (2001). Symposium Introduction: Colonialism, Culture, and the Law: A Foreword. Law & Social Inquiry, 26(2), 305–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00180.x
Cox, L., & Nilsen, A. G. (2005). What Would a Marxist Theory of Social Movements Look Like? https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/4409/1/LC_Theory.pdf
Dell’Angelo, J., Navas, G., Witteman, M., D’Alisa, G., Schidel, A., & Temper, L. (2021). Commons Grabbing and Agribusiness: Violence, Resistance, and Social Mobilization. Ecological Economics, 184, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004
Esin, C. (2011). Narrative Analysis Approaches. In N. Frost (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology: Combining Core Approaches (Chapter 5, pp. 92–118). McGraw Hill.
Geisler, C., & Makki, F. (2014). People, Power, and Land: New Enclosures on a Global Scale. Rural Sociology, 79(1), 28–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12030
Gurr, T. R. (1971). Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press.
Haller, T., Adams, T., Gmür, D., Käser, F., Lanz, K., Marfurt, F., Ryser, S., Schubiger, E., Von Sury, A., & Gerber, J.-D. (2019). Large-Scale Land Acquisition as Commons Grabbing: A Comparative Analysis of Six African Case Studies. In Global Perspectives on Long-Term Community Resource Management (pp. 125–164). Springer Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15800-2_7
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001
Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T. H., & McAlpine, C. (2019). Power, Politics, and Policy in the Appropriation of Urban Wetlands: The Critical Case of Sri Lanka. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(4), 729–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1393801
Huque, S. M., Pattanaik, S., & Parthasarathy, D. (2020). Cityscape Transformation and the Temporal Metamorphosis of East Kolkata Wetlands: A Political Ecology Perspective. Sociological Bulletin, 69(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919899020
Jahnavi, K. L., & Satpathy, S. (2021). “Our Wetland Is Our Mother, You Cannot Take Her Away From Us”: Reconstructing the Political Space of Reclaiming a Coastal Wetland in Sompeta, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Sociology, 8(2), 109–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.1979716
Jodha, N. S. (1986). Common Property Resources and Rural Poor in Dry Regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(27), 1169–1181.
Kerkvliet, B. J. (2014). Protests Over Land in Vietnam: Rightful Resistance and More. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 9(3), 19–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2014.9.3.19
Kim, J. H. (2016). Understanding Narrative Inquiry: The Crafting and Analysis of Stories as Research. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802861
Kurtz, L. R., & Smithey, L. A. (Eds.). (2018). The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements. Syracuse University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20p56zh DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20p56zh
Makki, F., & Geisler, C. (2011, April 6–8). Development by Dispossession: Land Grabbing as New Enclosures in Contemporary Ethiopia (pp. 1–21). Institute of Development Studies, Sussex University, Land Deal Politics Initiative and The Journal of Peasant Studies.
Mamonova, N. (2015). Resistance or Adaptation? Ukrainian Peasants’ Responses to Large-Scale Land Acquisitions. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3–4), 607–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.993320
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
Ndi, F. A. (2017). Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain. SAGE Open, 7(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682997
Nilsen, A. G. (2010). Dispossession and Resistance in India: The River and the Rage. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854976
O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. J. (2006). Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791086
Ostrom, E. (2003). How Types of Goods and Property Rights Affect Collective Action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739
Ostrom, E., & Schlager, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375
Pottier, J. (2005). Customary Land Tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa Today: Meanings and Contexts. In C. Huggins & J. Clover (Eds.), From the Ground Up: Land Rights, Conflict, and Peace in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 66–75). NISS Africa.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage.
Sarma, E. A. S. (2010). The Saga of Sompeta: Public Deception, Private Gains. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(33), 38–43.
Sebastian, M. K., Arun, P. R., & Jayapal, R. (2017). Documenting the Biodiversity of Sompeta Wetland, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, and Developing Biodiversity-Mediated Livelihood Options for Local Communities. SACON, Coimbatore.
Wall, D. (2014). The Commons in History: Culture, Conflict, and Ecology. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027212.001.0001
Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a Vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Trans. & Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77–128). Oxford University Press.
