Changing Livelihood Patterns among Irula Tribal Youth: A Study on Minor Forest Produce in Bettamugillalam, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu

Authors

  • S. Sudharsan Assistant Professor Department of Social Work (Aided), Madras Christian College, Chennai
  • B. Prince Solomon Devadass Associate Professor Department of Social Work (Aided), Madras Christian College, Chennai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2025/v44/i3/174140

Keywords:

Irula tribe, minor forest produce, livelihood patterns, Krishnagiri

Abstract

The Irula tribe of Tamil Nadu has historically depended on forest-based livelihoods rooted in indigenous ecological knowledge, including the collection of minor forest produce, horticulture, cattle rearing, and specialised occupations such as catching snakes and rodents. However, forest conservation policies, resettlement programmes, and rapid industrialisation have significantly altered these traditional livelihood systems, particularly for tribal youth. This study examines the changing livelihood patterns of Irula tribal youth in Bettamugillalam Village, Krishnagiri district, Tamil Nadu, with a specific focus on the transition from forest and agriculture-based livelihoods to urban unskilled labour. Adopting a descriptive research design and a triangulation approach, the study integrates quantitative data from structured interviews with qualitative insights from focus group discussions involving 50 Irula youth aged 15–35 years. The findings reveal a sharp decline in traditional occupations, such as horticulture, sericulture, cattle rearing, medicinal herb collection, and snake catching, after resettlement, alongside an increased dependence on low-paid, insecure urban employment. The study also highlights the erosion of common property resources, weakening of social capital, minimal participation in local governance, and heightened risks of psychological distress and impoverishment among resettled youth. The paper argues that resettlement-driven livelihood transitions, when implemented without adequate attention to sustainability, cultural continuity, and youth aspirations, deepen socio-economic vulnerability. It underscores the need for participatory rehabilitation policies, protection of common property resources, and skill-based livelihood interventions that integrate indigenous knowledge systems to ensure sustainable development and dignity for Irula tribal youth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ayyanar, M., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2005). Traditional knowledge of Kani tribals in Kouthalai of Tirunelveli hills, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 102(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.020

2. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1991). Sustainable livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper No. 296). Institute of Development Studies.

3. Chhetri, D. R., Parajuli, P., & Subba, G. C. (2005). Sikkim and Darjeeling Himalayan tribes, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 99(2), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.02.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.058

4. Dutt, R. (2000). Tribal development in India. Mittal Publications.

5. Fernandes, W., Menon, G., & Viegas, P. (1984). Forests, the environment, and the forest-dweller economy in Orissa. Indian Social Institute.

Gadgil, M., & Berkes, F. (1991). Traditional resource management systems. Resource Management and Optimisation, 8(3–4), 127–141.

6. Ignacimuthu, S., Ayyanar, M., & Sankarasivaraman, K. (2006). Ethnobotanical investigations among tribes in Madurai district of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-25

7. International Justice Mission. (2021). Forced labour and bonded labour in Tamil Nadu: Situational report. IJM India.

8. Kumar, P., Mruthyunjaya, & Dey, M. M. (2007). Long-term changes in India’s food basket and nutrition. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(35), 3567–3572.

9. Kumar, R., & Thomas, A. (2019). Educational challenges of Irula tribal children in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 5(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481119892567

10. Ministry of Tribal Affairs. (2023). Annual report 2022–23. Government of India. https://tribal.nic.in

11. Mishra, N. (2005). Eco-feminism: A global concern. Social Welfare, 51(3), 3–8.

12. Mukherjee, P. K., & Wahil, A. (2006). Integrated approaches towards drug development from Ayurveda and other systems of medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 103(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.024

13. Narayanaswamy, V., & Baskaran, A. (2018). Socio-economic vulnerabilities of Irula communities in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Social Work, 79(4), 541–558.

14. NITI Aayog. (2022). National SDG India index: Tracking progress on sustainable development goals. Government of India. https://www.niti.gov.in

15. Planning Commission. (2020). Evaluation study on tribal sub-plan implementation in Tamil Nadu. Government of India.

16. Raghavan, S. (2020). Tribal linguistic assimilation in South India: A case study of Irulas. Language in India, 20(1), 233–245.

17. Rao, P. (2018). The anthropology of South Indian tribes. Orient BlackSwan.

18. Ravichandran, M. (2022). Indigenous pest management practices of Irula tribes in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 21(3), 450–457.

19. Roy Burman, B. K. (1993). Tribal development in world system perspective. Social Change, 23(2–3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908579302300303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085719930204

20. Sainath, P. (2010). Politics of package & the packaging of politics. In Environment and social justice: An international perspective. Emerald.

21. Singh, B. (1992). Ground water resources and agricultural development strategy: Punjab experience. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47(1), 105–113.

22. Singh, G. S., Saxena, K. G., Rao, K. S., & Ram, S. C. (1996). Traditional knowledge and threat of its extinction in Chhankinal watershed in north-western Himalaya. Man in India, 76(1), 1–17.

23. Singh, K. (1994). Managing common pool resources: Principles and case studies. Oxford University Press.

24. Sundar, N. (2016). The Adivasi question: Issues of land, forest and livelihood. Orient BlackSwan.

25. UNDP. (2021). Human development report: India’s tribal development perspective. United Nations Development Programme.

26. Whitaker, R., & Ganesh, S. R. (2017). Snake catching and conservation: Lessons from the Irula community. Current Science, 112(4), 681–684.

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Sudharsan, S., & Devadass, B. P. S. (2026). Changing Livelihood Patterns among Irula Tribal Youth: A Study on Minor Forest Produce in Bettamugillalam, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Rural Development, 44(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2025/v44/i3/174140

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.